| From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Commit fest status |
| Date: | 2008-03-31 08:40:06 |
| Message-ID: | 87myof4789.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Well, it's the end of March, and I'm already starting to feel like we've
> been commit-festing forever :-(. At this point I see only one remaining
> patch that seems likely to go in without any further discussion --- that's
> Pavel's plpgsql EXECUTE USING thing.
A huge *thank you* for all your efforts. I know it's not the fun part of
your work.
> However, we've got boatloads of stuff that needs discussion and
> consensus-achievement. Please take a look at the queue
> http://momjian.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches
Alvaro tried to dump this list into:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/CommitFest:March
> and comment where you can. Remember that substantive comments or
> reviews should go to the mailing lists --- you can add annotations to
> that page if you want, but they'll be ephemeral.
And the patch authors are unlikely to see them unless they're also doing
reviews.
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Get trained by Bruce Momjian - ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostgreSQL training!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2008-03-31 08:48:46 | Re: Submission of Feature Request : RFC- for Implementing Transparent Data Encryption in P |
| Previous Message | NikhilS | 2008-03-31 08:36:16 | Re: [PATCHES] [badalex@gmail.com: Re: [BUGS] Problem identifying constraints which should not be inherited] |