Re: Bug in contrib/intagg int_array_enum() ?

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bug in contrib/intagg int_array_enum() ?
Date: 2003-03-27 23:07:19
Message-ID: 87llz0jtnc.fsf@stark.dyndns.tv
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> > I'm seeing some strange behaviour using the int_array_enum function in
> > contrib/intagg.
>
> AFAICT, intagg is completely unready to deal with arrays of other than
> one dimension; nor has it got any error checks to notice when the input
> is not 1-D. '{}' is treated as zero-dimensional ...

Ah, so then how do I construct a one-dimensional zero-sized array?

--
greg

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Hutchinson 2003-03-27 23:10:43 Re: transaction blocking inserts in postgresql 7.3
Previous Message Andrew Bartley 2003-03-27 22:54:54 Re: About OIDs