Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki
Date: 2007-08-04 16:48:58
Message-ID: 87lkcrkzyd.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www

"Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> writes:

> Not sure what your definition of normal is; that depends on what you mean by
> "registered". If it means just creating an account via web form, that's
> harldy an impediment to vandalism. We can certainly give more people the power
> to grant write-access to wiki accounts, if that's the perceived hold up.

Do we have any history of vandalism on the -hackers mailing list? There is no
approval mechanism for people subscribing to the list. Would people be happy
if every subscription to -hackers required someone to approve your membership?

I went to do update the wiki recently, found I didn't have write access and
gave up and went back to other things. I think any extra barriers are a bad
thing. It ought to be open until there's a demonstrable problem rather than
preemptively making it less useful because we anticipate problems we have no
evidence of.

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-08-04 16:56:32 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki
Previous Message Decibel! 2007-08-04 16:44:57 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-08-04 16:56:32 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki
Previous Message Decibel! 2007-08-04 16:44:57 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki