Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> It doesn't say that, because it isn't true. What is true is that if you
> make a trigger that prevents updates from happening, it breaks RI
> updates as well as directly-user-initiated updates.
Can we detect that this happened and throw an error? I suspect not, though,
since we have no way to actually determine whether the user trigger didn't do
something else equivalent.
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Get trained by Bruce Momjian - ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostgreSQL training!