Re: Review: Extensions Patch

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Review: Extensions Patch
Date: 2010-12-08 09:19:25
Message-ID: 87lj401v1e.fsf@hi-media-techno.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I think this so-called two-step approach is pretty ugly.

Well it does not need to be exposed to the user, thinking about it, as
proposed in the other thread. Other than that, you're argument here is
exactly the same as the ones saying that VACUUM or Hint Bints are
bad. It's just that if you want correctness, you don't have anything
better.

Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2010-12-08 09:22:33 Re: To Signal The postmaster
Previous Message Dimitri Fontaine 2010-12-08 09:17:25 Re: pg_execute_from_file review