Re: future of PQfn()

From: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: future of PQfn()
Date: 2026-06-04 10:39:02
Message-ID: 87ldcu1tfd.fsf@wibble.ilmari.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:

> - <sect1 id="libpq-fastpath">
> - <title>The Fast-Path Interface</title>
> -
> - <indexterm zone="libpq-fastpath">
> - <primary>fast path</primary>
> - </indexterm>

Should we move this to the "Obsolete or Renamed Features" appendix
(e.g. appendix-obsolete-libpq-fastpath.sgml) with a description of why
it was removed?

- ilmari

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nisha Moond 2026-06-04 10:54:43 Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication
Previous Message shveta malik 2026-06-04 10:35:06 Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication