From: | Doug Quale <quale1(at)charter(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: File Sytems Types and Os Recomendations |
Date: | 2003-09-24 16:18:30 |
Message-ID: | 87k77yrwh5.fsf@charter.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> scott.marlowe wrote:
> >
> > Someone on the list recently compared them, and linux came out marginally
> > faster than FreeBSD, but the difference was way less than what a faster
> > I/O subsystem, faster / more memory, or faster / more CPUs would make.
>
> That test was flawed because the user later reports that their IDE disks
> weren't using DMA on FreeBSD, while it was being used on Linux. He
> promised to report back.
The results on the website were updated on August 28 to fix this flaw
and to incorporate some suggestions made on the pgsql-performance list
(see http://www.potentialtech.com/wmoran/postgresql.php)
I don't know why he didn't report back to the list. He expressed the
desire that BSD benchmark faster than Linux, but the Linux numbers he
reports are still about 8-10% better than the FreeBSD numbers. Both
BSD and Linux are undergoing rapid development so this is pretty close
to even.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | scott.marlowe | 2003-09-24 17:16:58 | Re: File Sytems Types and Os Recomendations |
Previous Message | Nick Fankhauser | 2003-09-24 15:07:51 | Re: Problem with n_distinct being consistently inaccurate. |