Re: Release cycle length

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Release cycle length
Date: 2003-11-18 05:53:12
Message-ID: 87k75ygr3r.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
>> 0. As you say, make it known to the public. Have people test their
>> in-development applications using a beta.
>
> and how do you propose we do that? I think this is the hard part

(1) Make the beta more obvious on the website, as we've already
discussed

(2) Make a freshmeat.net release announcement for _each_ beta, RC, and
of course the final release (we totally missed this during 7.4).
There are probably other software release announcement sites we
could inform.

(3) Is it worth trying to get some technical press coverage for the
start of the beta process? I don't mean on PHB-oriented sites like
ComputerWorld or ZdNet where we need to do the work of getting a
press release prepared, but OSNews or Slashdot just need a link to
the release notes and the source tarballs.

Any other suggestions?

Perhaps we could add a list of this sort to src/tools/RELEASE_CHANGES?

-Neil

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2003-11-18 06:00:56 Re: Release cycle length
Previous Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2003-11-18 05:52:59 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2003-11-18 06:00:56 Re: Release cycle length
Previous Message elein 2003-11-18 05:03:41 7.4 official docs : Fonts?