| From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | aspire420(at)hotpop(dot)com, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PERFORM] Tables Without OIDS and its effect |
| Date: | 2003-12-15 02:10:15 |
| Message-ID: | 87k74yg7aw.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-performance |
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I don't believe anyone has proposed removing the facility
> altogether. There's a big difference between making the default
> behavior be not to have OIDs and removing the ability to have OIDs.
Right, that's what I had meant to say. Sorry for the inaccuracy.
-Neil
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | pginfo | 2003-12-15 06:05:09 | Re: [ADMIN] FoxPro Vs. PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-12-14 22:52:35 | Re: [PERFORM] Tables Without OIDS and its effect |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew G. Hammond | 2003-12-15 04:17:19 | Re: Hardware suggestions for Linux/PGSQL server |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-12-14 22:52:35 | Re: [PERFORM] Tables Without OIDS and its effect |