| From: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Shay Rojansky <roji(at)roji(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Stored procedures and out parameters |
| Date: | 2018-07-23 17:38:05 |
| Message-ID: | 87k1plhot6.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "Robert" == Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> However, connecting via Npgsql, which uses the extended protocol, I
>> see something quite different. As a response to a Describe
>> PostgreSQL message, I get back a NoData response rather than a
>> RowDescription message, In other words, it would seem that the
>> behavior of stored procedures differs between the simple and
>> extended protocols, when INOUT parameters are involved.
Robert> I might be wrong, but that sounds like a bug.
Completely off the cuff, I'd expect 59a85323d might have fixed that;
does it fail on the latest 11-stable?
--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrey Borodin | 2018-07-23 18:04:57 | Re: GiST VACUUM |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2018-07-23 17:14:04 | Re: How can we submit code patches that implement our (pending) patents? |