| From: | Arseny Sher <a(dot)sher(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Parallel query vs smart shutdown and Postmaster death |
| Date: | 2019-03-18 08:25:01 |
| Message-ID: | 87k1gwpp2a.fsf@ars-thinkpad |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Just a thought: instead of the new hand-coded loop you added in
> pmdie(), do you think it would make sense to have a new argument
> "exclude_class_mask" for SignalSomeChildren()? If we did that, I
> would consider renaming the existing parameter "target" to
> "include_type_mask" to make it super clear what's going on.
I thought that this is a bit too complicated for single use-case, but if
you like it better, here is an updated version.
--
Arseny Sher
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-Allow-parallel-workers-while-backends-are-alive-i-v2.patch | text/x-diff | 5.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2019-03-18 09:35:05 | Re: Tid scan improvements |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2019-03-18 08:18:21 | Re: partitioned tables referenced by FKs |