From: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SQL-spec incompatibilities in similar_escape() and related stuff |
Date: | 2019-05-13 17:43:08 |
Message-ID: | 87k1eufem8.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
Andrew> The ESCAPE part could in theory be ambiguous if the SIMILAR
Andrew> expression ends in a ... SIMILAR TO xxx operator, since then we
Andrew> wouldn't know whether to attach the ESCAPE to that or keep it
Andrew> as part of the function syntax. But I think this is probably a
Andrew> non-issue. More significant is that ... COLNAME ! ESCAPE ...
Andrew> again has postfix- vs. infix-operator ambiguities.
And this ambiguity shows up already in other contexts:
select 'foo' similar to 'f' || escape escape escape from (values ('oo')) v(escape);
psql: ERROR: syntax error at or near "escape"
LINE 1: select 'foo' similar to 'f' || escape escape escape from (va...
select 'foo' similar to 'f' || escape escape from (values ('oo')) v(escape);
psql: ERROR: operator does not exist: unknown ||
LINE 1: select 'foo' similar to 'f' || escape escape from (values ('...
I guess this happens because ESCAPE has precedence below POSTFIXOP, so
the ('f' ||) gets reduced in preference to shifting in the first ESCAPE
token.
--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2019-05-13 17:48:00 | Re: pg12 release notes |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2019-05-13 17:38:34 | Re: [HACKERS] Unlogged tables cleanup |