Re: [PATCHES] Solve a problem of LC_TIME of windows.

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Hiroshi Saito <z-saito(at)guitar(dot)ocn(dot)ne(dot)jp>, ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Solve a problem of LC_TIME of windows.
Date: 2008-11-24 15:29:22
Message-ID: 87hc5xrvl9.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> Please stick to the convention of including include files in
> alphabetical order.

I didn't realize we had such a convention. Is this for all include files or
only within a directory? Are there exceptions where the order matters or have
we managed to make sure it doesn't everywhere?

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Get trained by Bruce Momjian - ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostgreSQL training!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-11-24 15:44:40 Re: [PATCHES] Solve a problem of LC_TIME of windows.
Previous Message Marko Kreen 2008-11-24 15:25:09 Re: [bugfix] DISCARD ALL does not release advisory locks

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-11-24 15:44:40 Re: [PATCHES] Solve a problem of LC_TIME of windows.
Previous Message Hiroshi Saito 2008-11-24 15:12:38 Re: [PATCHES] Solve a problem of LC_TIME of windows.