| From: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Should contrib modules install .h files? |
| Date: | 2018-08-02 16:53:17 |
| Message-ID: | 87h8kcaf1j.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "Andres" == Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
>> Also, "near future" means "before Monday". I don't want to ship
>> beta3 with this in place if we end up reverting later, because it'd
>> mean thrashing packagers' file manifests, which they won't
>> appreciate. It might be best to revert in v11 for now, and then we
>> can put it back after beta3 if there's agreement that the questions
>> are satisfactorily resolved.
Andres> +1
On the other hand, _I'm_ getting pressure from at least one packager to
nail down a final release of pllua-ng so they can build it along with
beta3 (in place of the old broken pllua), which obviously I can't do if
I keep having to fiddle with workarounds for hstore.h.
--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-08-02 16:56:22 | Re: Should contrib modules install .h files? |
| Previous Message | Andrew Gierth | 2018-08-02 16:46:22 | Re: Should contrib modules install .h files? |