Re: prepareable statements

From: Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>
To: PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: prepareable statements
Date: 2002-08-07 02:57:54
Message-ID: 87fzxrml3h.fsf@klamath.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org (Neil Conway) writes:
> I've attached an updated version of the prepareable statements patch. It
> is very similar to the latest patch I posted on -hackers -- the only new
> changes are a few comment fixes, an unrelated typo fix, and re-sync
> with latest CVS. I'm not aware of any outstanding issues with the patch,
> so if you'd like me to change something, let me know.

Here's the patch, re-synced with latest CVS -- no other changes.

Regarding the syntax debate, my personal preference is to stick with
the current (function-like) syntax, but I'm not too worried about this
point. I'd prefer that the patch be committed in one form or another
reasonably quickly, so that I have enough time to write the
documentation and do some general "polish" work before the beta.

Let me know what changes, if any, still need to be made.

Cheers,

Neil

--
Neil Conway <neilconway(at)rogers(dot)com>
PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC

Attachment Content-Type Size
new_qcache-16.patch text/x-patch 44.8 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-08-07 04:10:12 Re: current_database()
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-08-07 02:32:22 Re: anonymous composite types