Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Multiple DB join

From: Jorge Godoy <jgodoy(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Multiple DB join
Date: 2006-08-15 12:01:03
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-sql
Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> writes:

> And why multiple databases instead of multiple schemas within the
> same database?  Or even all data in the same schema?  Is there a
> reason for the segregation?

I can think that spreading processing requirements should be one.  And
distributing load another one.  Disk space can be solved with new disks and
tablespaces, but we can't yet distribute the load through several servers
without partitioning.

Jorge Godoy      <jgodoy(at)gmail(dot)com>

In response to


pgsql-sql by date

Next:From: Kis János TamásDate: 2006-08-15 12:20:06
Subject: Re: Undo an update
Previous:From: Michael FuhrDate: 2006-08-15 11:38:32
Subject: Re: Multiple DB join

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group