Re: Hmmm ... isn't count_nondeletable_pages all wet?

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hmmm ... isn't count_nondeletable_pages all wet?
Date: 2007-09-16 09:56:30
Message-ID: 87fy1fkk6p.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers

"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> It's a corner case, but I say it's a must-fix.

Of course

> Those bug reports have been bothering me for most of a year ...

Are there any other outstanding reports like that?

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-09-16 15:14:55 Re: Hmmm ... isn't count_nondeletable_pages all wet?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-09-16 00:57:17 Re: Hmmm ... isn't count_nondeletable_pages all wet?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Eretna Evrengizid 2007-09-16 12:13:45 database diagram
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-09-16 02:05:55 Re: [HACKERS] invalidly encoded strings