Re: Open items

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Open items
Date: 2002-10-10 17:34:14
Message-ID: 87elaymc4p.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Schema handling - ready? interfaces? client apps?
> Drop column handling - ready for all clients, apps?

How will delaying 7.3 remedy either of these issues?

> Get bison upgrade on postgresql.org for ecpg only (Marc)

Now that bison 1.50 is out, this should probably be "upgrade bison on
postgresql.org, merge ecpg branch".

> Return last command of INSTEAD rule for tuple count/oid/tag for
> rules, SPI

Can someone summarize what the consensus on this issue is? I can take
a look at implementing it, I just lost track of what the final
conclusion was...

> Add schema dump option to pg_dump

Why do we need this for 7.3?

Cheers,

Neil

--
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC

In response to

  • Open items at 2002-10-10 14:04:20 from Bruce Momjian

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-10-10 17:38:05 Re: inline newNode()
Previous Message Neil Conway 2002-10-10 17:28:47 Re: inline newNode()