Re: Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>, Mark Cave-Ayland <m(dot)cave-ayland(at)webbased(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations
Date: 2005-05-18 05:04:41
Message-ID: 87ekc5cefq.fsf@stark.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> Do we know that? The results I showed put at least one fundamentally
> 32bit platform (the PowerBook I'm typing this on) at dead par for 32bit
> and 64bit CRCs.

Wait, par for 32-bit CRCs? Or for 64-bit CRCs calculated using 32-bit ints?

--
greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeffrey W. Baker 2005-05-18 05:12:17 Bitmap scan cost model (was Re: bitmap scans, btree scans, and tid order)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-05-18 05:01:54 Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry)