| From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Gevik Babakhani" <pgdev(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: V0.2 patch for TODO Item: SQL-language referenceparameters by name. |
| Date: | 2007-11-03 17:21:52 |
| Message-ID: | 87ejf7s0r3.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
"David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> What I mean by "kinda" is that it's a standard way of handling
> parameters in Oracle and in DBI.
That's a good reason *not* to use them for other purposes. Users trying to
create procedures through DBI or other interfaces like it will run into
problems when the driver misinterprets the parameters.
> I think it would be a very bad idea
> to require that people use the function name in parameters,
I think were talking about only allowing it to disambiguate if the name is
shadowed by a variable in an inner scope.
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's RemoteDBA services!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gevik Babakhani | 2007-11-03 18:04:08 | Re: V0.2 patch for TODO Item: SQL-language referenceparameters by name. |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2007-11-03 17:15:48 | Re: V0.2 patch for TODO Item: SQL-language reference parameters by name. |