Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.

From: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.
Date: 2018-04-07 21:04:27
Message-ID: 87efjqivcn.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>>>> "Teodor" == Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> writes:

>> Support for testing amcaninclude via
>> pg_indexam_has_property(oid,'can_include') seems to be missing?
>>
>> Also the return values of pg_index_column_has_property for included
>> columns seem a bit dubious... should probably be returning NULL for most
>> properties except 'returnable'.

Teodor> Damn, you right, it's missed.

>> I can look at fixing these for you if you like?

Teodor> If you will do that I will be very grateful

OK, I will deal with it.

--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-04-07 21:13:31 Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-04-07 21:02:18 pgsql: Support partition pruning at execution time