Re: Listing views

From: Doug McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org>
To: Olivier Guilyardi <ml(at)xung(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Listing views
Date: 2004-08-10 14:58:57
Message-ID: 87d61zghu6.fsf@asmodeus.mcnaught.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Olivier Guilyardi <ml(at)xung(dot)org> writes:

> Okay, that's what I thought : an initial little query to identify the server
> version, so that subsequent queries can be adapted accordingly...
>
> But, since this "What Postgresql version is this ?" query is
> silently performed by the library I'm interested in, what the host
> application is not supposed to know, it must be ensured that it's
> not going to break : is version() the way to go ? Could there be
> some permission issues with very restrictive user accounts ? Some
> better _only-one-query_ way to identify the server version/features
> ?

'SELECT version();' should work. There will be no permission issues
with calling that function unless you set the database up that way--it
has PUBLIC execute permission by default.

-Doug
--
Let us cross over the river, and rest under the shade of the trees.
--T. J. Jackson, 1863

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Liam Lesboch 2004-08-10 15:09:20 Replication options?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-08-10 14:35:20 Re: nested transaction