| From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "PostgreSQL-development Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Ordered Append Node |
| Date: | 2008-04-07 09:22:12 |
| Message-ID: | 87d4p2ow8r.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> I've been hacking on the idea of an Append node which maintains the ordering
>> of its subtables merging their records in order.
>
> I finally got round to looking at this ...
A lot of things to chew on. Thanks very much.
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's On-Demand Production Tuning
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-04-07 09:30:48 | Re: New style of hash join proposal |
| Previous Message | Stuart Brooks | 2008-04-07 08:04:51 | Re: [HACKERS] ANALYZE getting dead tuple count hopelessly wrong |