Re: High Availability with Postgres

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
To: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: High Availability with Postgres
Date: 2010-06-22 08:58:05
Message-ID: 87bpb3qw9u.fsf@hi-media-techno.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> writes:
> failure modes can
> include things like failing fans (which will be detected, resulting in a
> server shutdown if too many fail), power supply failure (redundant PSUs, but
> I've seen the power combining circuitry fail). Any of these sorts of
> failures will result in a failover without corrupting the data.
>
> and of course, intentional planned failovers to do OS maintenance... you
> patch the standby system, fail over to it and verify its good, then patch
> the other system.

Ah, I see the use case much better now, thank you. And I begin too see
how expensive reaching such a goal is, too. Going from "I can lose this
many transactions" to "No data lost, ever" is at that price, though.

Regards,
--
dim

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2010-06-22 09:08:02 Re: Hot Standby switchover
Previous Message Dimitri Fontaine 2010-06-22 08:49:00 Re: What type of index should I use?