| From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Inline Extension |
| Date: | 2012-01-23 15:46:55 |
| Message-ID: | 87bopuctg0.fsf@hi-media-techno.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Hmm, I don't think I like that design. I think we should view this as
> a way to embed the SQL and control files needed by the extension in
> the server, rather than a separate thing called an inline extension.
> If pg_dump is going to dump those files, it ought to dump them all,
> not just some subset of them.
Ok, but then, what about .so files? Wouldn't it make sense to be able
to ship also the executable modules needed, and if not, why not?
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-01-23 15:49:16 | Re: basic pgbench runs with various performance-related patches |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-01-23 15:39:08 | Re: Inline Extension |