|From:||Amos Bird <amosbird(at)gmail(dot)com>|
|To:||Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>|
|Cc:||PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>|
|Subject:||Re: PATCH: psql show index with type info|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
Yeah, I'm thinking about that too. Here is a full list of the original
What else do you think will benefit from extra type information?
Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> * Amos Bird (amosbird(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
>> Well, the prefix is used to differentiate other \d commands, like
> Ah, ok, fair enough.
> Should we consider differentiating different table types also? I
> suppose those are primairly just logged and unlogged, but I could see
> that being useful information to know when doing a \dt. Not a big deal
> either way though, and this patch stands on its own certainly.
|Next Message||Erik Rijkers||2017-03-06 15:10:19||Re: Logical replication existing data copy|
|Previous Message||Rader, David||2017-03-06 14:45:47||Re: [BUGS] Seems bug in postgres_fdw?|