From: | Amos Bird <amosbird(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PATCH: psql show index with type info |
Date: | 2017-03-06 14:51:30 |
Message-ID: | 87bmte1mrx.fsf@t450s |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Yeah, I'm thinking about that too. Here is a full list of the original
type values,
"Schema"
"Name"
"table"
"view"
"materialized view"
"index"
"sequence"
"special"
"foreign table"
"table"
What else do you think will benefit from extra type information?
regards,
Amos
Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> Amos,
>
> * Amos Bird (amosbird(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
>> Well, the prefix is used to differentiate other \d commands, like
>> this,
>
> Ah, ok, fair enough.
>
> Should we consider differentiating different table types also? I
> suppose those are primairly just logged and unlogged, but I could see
> that being useful information to know when doing a \dt. Not a big deal
> either way though, and this patch stands on its own certainly.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Erik Rijkers | 2017-03-06 15:10:19 | Re: Logical replication existing data copy |
Previous Message | Rader, David | 2017-03-06 14:45:47 | Re: [BUGS] Seems bug in postgres_fdw? |