Re: [SECURITY] DoS attack on backend possible (was: Re:

From: Florian Weimer <Weimer(at)CERT(dot)Uni-Stuttgart(dot)DE>
To: Greg Copeland <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [SECURITY] DoS attack on backend possible (was: Re:
Date: 2002-08-12 13:48:10
Message-ID: 87adns2nol.fsf@CERT.Uni-Stuttgart.DE
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Greg Copeland <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net> writes:

> Well, if it's a buffer overrun, there is certainly potential for risks
> well beyond that of simply crashing the "be".

It's a buffer overrun, but the data has to pass through the date/time
parser in the backend, so it's not entirely obvious how you can
exploit this to run arbitrary code.

--
Florian Weimer Weimer(at)CERT(dot)Uni-Stuttgart(dot)DE
University of Stuttgart http://CERT.Uni-Stuttgart.DE/people/fw/
RUS-CERT fax +49-711-685-5898

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florian Weimer 2002-08-12 13:51:35 Re: [SECURITY] DoS attack on backend possible (was: Re:
Previous Message Greg Copeland 2002-08-12 13:24:16 Re: [SECURITY] DoS attack on backend possible (was: Re:

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florian Weimer 2002-08-12 13:51:35 Re: [SECURITY] DoS attack on backend possible (was: Re:
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-08-12 13:40:12 Re: Strange bahaviour