Re: Feature freeze progress report

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Feature freeze progress report
Date: 2007-05-03 11:31:26
Message-ID: 878xc62lf5.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www


"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> You keep saying that but I think it's wrong. There are trivial patches that
>> were submitted last year that are still sitting in the queue.
>
> Um ... which ones exactly? I don't see *anything* in the current queue
> that is utterly without issues

I didn't mean they were without issues. Only that they weren't complex patches
requiring broad knowledge of many parts of the system.

Anyways, I think we're well on our way to improving the situation so I don't
want to drag out my negativity any longer.

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-05-03 11:32:12 Re: Feature freeze progress report
Previous Message Alexey Klyukin 2007-05-03 09:29:54 Re: Subversion repo up

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-05-03 11:32:12 Re: Feature freeze progress report
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-05-03 05:30:39 Re: Feature freeze progress report