Re: Incorrect estimates on correlated filters

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Craig Ringer" <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: "Decibel!" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, "Chris Kratz" <chris(dot)kratz(at)vistashare(dot)com>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Incorrect estimates on correlated filters
Date: 2008-08-14 10:12:00
Message-ID: 878wuzvrbj.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

"Craig Ringer" <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> writes:

> It strikes me that there are really two types of query hint possible here.
>
> One tells the planner (eg) "prefer a merge join here".
>
> The other gives the planner more information that it might not otherwise
> have to work with, so it can improve its decisions. "The values used in
> this join condition are highly correlated".

This sounds familiar:

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.general/55730/match=hints

Plus ça change...

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's On-Demand Production Tuning

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2008-08-14 14:10:24 Re: Filesystem benchmarking for pg 8.3.3 server
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-08-14 09:51:01 Re: [HACKERS] autovacuum: use case for indenpedent TOAST table autovac settings