| From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Gauthier\, Dave" <dave(dot)gauthier(at)intel(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Erik Jones <ejones(at)engineyard(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>, "pgsql-general\(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Justifying a PG over MySQL approach to a project |
| Date: | 2009-12-17 16:56:03 |
| Message-ID: | 877hslilp8.fsf@hi-media-techno.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
"Gauthier, Dave" <dave(dot)gauthier(at)intel(dot)com> writes:
> I am more concerned with getting a robust DB replication system up and
> running. Bucardo looks pretty good, but I've just started looking at
> the options. Any suggestions?
Master Slave replication? Meaning no writes on the "sister site".
If yes, consider Londiste from Skytools. Easy to setup and maintain, and
robust.
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Skytools
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Londiste_Tutorial
Regards,
--
dim
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2009-12-17 16:57:40 | Re: Justifying a PG over MySQL approach to a project |
| Previous Message | Richard Broersma | 2009-12-17 16:51:19 | Re: Justifying a PG over MySQL approach to a project |