Re: collations in shared catalogs?

From: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: collations in shared catalogs?
Date: 2015-02-25 17:59:41
Message-ID: 877fv598nl.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

>> So while helping someone with an unrelated issue, I did a quick
>> query to look for collation-dependent indexes, and was rather
>> shocked to find that not only are there two such in the system
>> catalogs, both set to "default" collation, but that one of them is
>> in a _shared_ catalog (pg_shseclabel).

>> How did that happen? And how could it possibly work?

Tom> It probably doesn't, and the reason nobody has noticed is that the
Tom> security label stuff has fewer users than I have fingers (and
Tom> those people aren't using provider names that would cause anything
Tom> interesting to happen).

Or possibly not mixing locales between databases.

Tom> The most obvious fix is to change "provider" to a NAME column.

Tom> What was the other case? We might want to add a regression test
Tom> to check for collation-dependent system indexes ...

pg_seclabel (also "provider").

--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2015-02-25 18:13:21 Re: mogrify and indent features for jsonb
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-02-25 17:12:53 Re: PostgreSQL on z/OS UNIX?