Re: spurious(?) warnings in archive recovery

From: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: spurious(?) warnings in archive recovery
Date: 2018-11-30 04:38:55
Message-ID: 877egvmb7z.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:

Andrew> Here is a script that reproduces the issue conveniently.
Andrew> This is targetted for pg11, might also work on pg10

Nope, forgot I'd used non-atomic DO, so pg11 or later only.
It could be rewritten easily enough to avoid that.

--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2018-11-30 04:46:50 Re: idle-in-transaction timeout error does not give a hint
Previous Message Andrew Gierth 2018-11-30 04:25:39 Re: spurious(?) warnings in archive recovery