Re: Concerns about this release

From: Jason Earl <jason(dot)earl(at)simplot(dot)com>
To: Doug McNaught <doug(at)wireboard(dot)com>
Cc: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "mlw" <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Concerns about this release
Date: 2001-12-19 18:05:09
Message-ID: 876673krvu.fsf@npa01zz001.simplot.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Doug McNaught <doug(at)wireboard(dot)com> writes:

> "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
>
> > Just for the record, I *never* use a x.x version of anything, especially
> > Postgres. I'll wait until at least 7.2.1 before running it on a production
> > server...
> >
> > Not saying that there's anything wrong with 7.2 - just that there's _always_
> > interesting problems (look at the changelogs for 7.1.1 - 7.1.3)
>
> On the other hand, *somebody's* got to use x.x, otherwise the
> "interesting" problems would never get found. ;)

It's simple. The people who use the x.x releases are those that
either 1) need the added functionality or 2) haven't read the HACKERS
mailing list :).

Personally the new non-locking VACUUM is enough of a win for me that I
will be giving 7.2 a whirl sooner rather than later. In fact, I have
a planned downtime over the Christmas holiday, and I have been toying
with the idea of rolling out whatever is available (even if it isn't
the official release). In fact, if there was a Debian package of
7.2b4 I would probably be running it right now (hint hint).

Jason

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Owens 2001-12-19 18:22:58 Re: Connection Pooling, a year later
Previous Message Andrew Bell 2001-12-19 17:52:10 long ints use for 4-byte entities in ODBC