| From: | Nic <nferrier(at)tapsellferrier(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Rich Cullingford <rculling(at)sysd(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: JDBC stored procs doc patch |
| Date: | 2003-07-30 19:44:24 |
| Message-ID: | 8765ljg5pj.fsf@tapsellferrier.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc pgsql-patches |
Rich Cullingford <rculling(at)sysd(dot)com> writes:
> I'm confused: this appears to say that setFetchSize() now works in some
> version of PG JDBC. As of the JDBC that builds with PG 7.3.3,
> setFetchSize() claims it's "unimplemented." Also, this looks like
> straight client-side Java code; what's the "stored procs" part of the
> patch? We don't have Java inside PG yet, do we?
The stuff supporting this doc patch is all in CVS.
The stored procs part of the patch is documentation (that was missing
previously) on the use of CallableStatment.
There is also stored proc related doc on an entirely new feature of
the JDBC driver, the ability to seamlessly handle refcursor return
values from procs.
--
Nic Ferrier
http://www.tapsellferrier.co.uk
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sergio Pili | 2003-07-30 21:21:37 | Error in JDBC compiling 7.3.4 |
| Previous Message | Fernando Nasser | 2003-07-30 16:06:51 | Re: JDBC stored procs doc patch |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sean Chittenden | 2003-07-30 21:10:26 | Re: [PATCHES] [PATCH] Re: Why READ ONLY transactions? |
| Previous Message | Claudio Lapidus | 2003-07-30 19:16:23 | hexadecimal to decimal |