Re: [BUGS] Bug in create operator and/or initdb

"John Hansen" <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au> writes:

> I wouldn't think so, anyone I've spoken with has come up with other ways of
> managing that kind of info, because of, as you mentioned, it's lack of
> proper index methods.

On the contrary I'm using it for something that isn't really what it was
designed for precisely *because* of the index methods. What index access
methods are you looking for that are lacking?

db=> explain select * from foo where foo_code << '4.0.0.0/8';
QUERY PLAN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Index Scan using foo_foo_code on foo (cost=0.00..34.56 rows=1695 width=229)
Index Cond: ((foo_code > '4.0.0.0/8'::cidr) AND (foo_code <= '4.255.255.255'::cidr))
Filter: (foo_code << '4.0.0.0/8'::cidr)
(3 rows)

--
greg