Re: LW Boston

From: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: LW Boston
Date: 2006-04-09 02:32:49
Message-ID: 8764ljlbqm.fsf@wolfe.cbbrowne.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general

Quoth jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com ("Joshua D. Drake"):
> Thanks everyone for helping us make the PostgreSQL booth the best OSS
> booth in the pavilion.

Good show...

In what ways was the PostgreSQL booth best? Busiest? Most, um, ???
--
wm(X,Y):-write(X),write('@'),write(Y). wm('cbbrowne','gmail.com').
http://linuxdatabases.info/info/lsf.html
"I don't know what OS we will be running in 40 years, but it will
probably be called Unix...."
-- Chris Mikkelson <mikk0022(at)maroon(dot)tc(dot)umn(dot)edu>

In response to

  • LW Boston at 2006-04-08 17:59:26 from Joshua D. Drake

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Luke Lonergan 2006-04-09 02:47:04 Re: LW Boston
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-04-09 01:44:22 Re: OSCON

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-04-09 02:34:47 "Fat" binaries for OS X (was Re: [GENERAL] Postgres Library natively available for Mac OSX Intel?)
Previous Message Michael Glaesemann 2006-04-09 02:08:16 Re: Strange syntax for create/drop index