Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS?
Date: 2002-09-26 03:58:21
Message-ID: 876.1033012701@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> OK, I am back. I think the most promising proposal was from you, Tom:
> http://candle.pha.pa.us/mhonarc/todo.detail/return/msg00012.html

But that wasn't a specific proposal --- it was more or less an
enumeration of the possibilities. What are we picking?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-09-26 04:00:10 Re: postmaster -d option (was Re: [GENERAL] Relation 0 does not exist)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-09-26 03:56:56 Re: compiling client utils under win32 - current 7.3devel