Re: Sketch of extending error handling for subtransactions in functions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Sketch of extending error handling for subtransactions in functions
Date: 2004-07-25 01:18:55
Message-ID: 8751.1090718335@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yes. This is an integral part of finishing nested transactions.

> Oh, is this exceptions in functions or the ability to allow functions to
> keep executing after an SQL error?

Those are the same thing, aren't they? But yes, that's the point here.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-07-25 01:20:43 Re: Sketch of extending error handling for subtransactions
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-07-25 01:16:56 Re: Sketch of extending error handling for subtransactions