Re: Long running update

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Andrew Janian" <ajanian(at)scottrade(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Long running update
Date: 2005-10-16 17:07:29
Message-ID: 8742.1129482449@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Andrew Janian" <ajanian(at)scottrade(dot)com> writes:
> I needed to expand the size of one of the varchar columns in a table of
> my 135GB database.

How big is the particular table you are doing this on? What foreign key
relationships is it involved in? (I wonder if the time is going into FK
checking more than the actual update...) What PG version exactly?

Personally, at this point I'd cancel the update while there's still time
to do a VACUUM before you have to be operational again. You could do
the required operation (increasing a varchar's limit) in O(1) time by
twiddling the system catalogs. You're going to need a VACUUM anyway
because of all the dead tuple versions left behind by the UPDATE.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2005-10-16 17:08:41 Re: unsigned types
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2005-10-16 17:06:31 Re: PostgreSQL Gotchas