Re: "(process)" is missing for some terms about process in glossary

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: "(process)" is missing for some terms about process in glossary
Date: 2022-01-13 03:22:06
Message-ID: 8741f3ce-6e42-0f71-2096-d7e7d251582e@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On 2022/01/08 1:41, Tom Lane wrote:
> Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> writes:
>> In glossary, the title of each term about process seems to consist of the process name and "(process)", e.g., Checkpointer (process). But I found that "(process)" is missing for the following three terms about process. Attached is the patch to add "(process)" to them.
>
>> - Auxiliary process
>> - Startup process
>> - WAL receiver
>
> I think "Auxiliary process (process)" is redundant to the point
> of being silly. +1 for addiing it to "WAL receiver", though,
> since that's not obviously a process.

Yes, you're right. So I pushed the patch that adds "(process)"
only to the glossary term "WAL receiver". Thanks!

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shinya Kato 2022-01-13 07:07:38 Re: Question about role attributes docs
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2022-01-11 17:07:25 Re: Question about role attributes docs