Re: DROP COLUMN misbehaviour with multiple inheritance

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)atentus(dot)com>, hannu(at)tm(dot)ee, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: DROP COLUMN misbehaviour with multiple inheritance
Date: 2002-09-20 03:29:05
Message-ID: 873cs58hku.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> >> Has anyone given much thought as to perhaps we could just drop
> >> multiple inheritance from Postgres?
>
> > I am for it. Multiple inheritance is more of a mess than a help.
>
> I'm not agin it

I'm abstaining.

> but if that's the lay of the land then we have no need to apply a
> last-minute catalog reformatting to fix a multiple-inheritance bug.

The catalog format has changed since beta1 anyway due to the casting
changes, right? (not to mention the split -> split_part change). If
that's the case, I don't see a good reason not to include the fix,
provided it's reasonably low-risk.

Cheers,

Neil

--
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-09-20 03:32:35 Re: DROP COLUMN misbehaviour with multiple inheritance
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-09-20 03:15:11 Re: DROP COLUMN misbehaviour with multiple inheritance

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-09-20 03:32:35 Re: DROP COLUMN misbehaviour with multiple inheritance
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-09-20 03:15:11 Re: DROP COLUMN misbehaviour with multiple inheritance