Re: [HACKERS] Database replication... - Mission Critica

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: "Mikheev, Vadim" <VMIKHEEV(at)sectordata(dot)com>
Cc: "'Bill Gribble'" <grib(at)linuxdevel(dot)com>, Greg Patnude <GPatnude(at)adelphia(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Database replication... - Mission Critica
Date: 2002-11-07 15:09:44
Message-ID: 873cqdh0w7.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

"Mikheev, Vadim" <VMIKHEEV(at)sectordata(dot)com> writes:
> > My presumption would be that if you initialize 2 databases to
> > a known identical start, have all the same triggers and rules
> > on both, then send all queries to both databases, you will
> > have 2 identical databases at the end.
>
> This is wrong assumption.

Agreed. Another simple example is:

INSERT INTO foo VALUES (random());

Cheers,

Neil

--
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2002-11-07 15:18:15 Re: licenses & price?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-11-07 15:05:28 Re: Failed to initialize lc_messages 7.3b5

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2002-11-07 15:12:27 Re: command
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-11-07 15:05:28 Re: Failed to initialize lc_messages 7.3b5