回复：BUG #19040: Memory leak in hashed subplan node due to missing hashtempcxt reset

From: 李海洋(陌痕) <mohen(dot)lhy(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "feichanghong" <feichanghong(at)qq(dot)com>, "ocean_li_996" <ocean_li_996(at)163(dot)com>, "pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: 回复：BUG #19040: Memory leak in hashed subplan node due to missing hashtempcxt reset
Date: 2025-09-09 01:52:26
Message-ID: 873ca0f7-3856-494f-bf9d-25c530382bb6.mohen.lhy@alibaba-inc.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On 2025-09-08 20:46:10 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Concretely, I'm thinking about the attached. 0001 is the same
> logic as in the v02 patch, but I felt we could make the code
> be shorter and prettier instead of longer and uglier. That’s
> meant for back-patch, and then 0002 is for master only.
Yeah, v04-0001 and v04-0002 look good for me.
Thanks for refining the patch.
—
Thanks
Haiyang Li

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message feichanghong 2025-09-09 02:51:56 Re: BUG #19040: Memory leak in hashed subplan node due to missing hashtempcxt reset
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-09-08 20:46:10 Re: BUG #19040: Memory leak in hashed subplan node due to missing hashtempcxt reset