| From: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)MIT(dot)EDU>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] ARC Memory Usage analysis |
| Date: | 2004-10-26 05:27:29 |
| Message-ID: | 873c02ujzy.fsf@stark.xeocode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches pgsql-performance |
Is something broken with the list software? I'm receiving other emails from
the list but I haven't received any of the mails in this thread. I'm only able
to follow the thread based on the emails people are cc'ing to me directly.
I think I've caught this behaviour in the past as well. Is it a misguided list
software feature trying to avoid duplicates or something like that? It makes
it really hard to follow threads in MUAs with good filtering since they're
fragmented between two mailboxes.
--
greg
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-10-26 05:53:55 | Re: [PATCHES] ARC Memory Usage analysis |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2004-10-26 05:17:40 | Re: [PATCHES] ARC Memory Usage analysis |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Matthew T. O'Connor | 2004-10-26 05:40:11 | pg_autovacuum vacuum cost variables patch |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2004-10-26 05:17:40 | Re: [PATCHES] ARC Memory Usage analysis |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-10-26 05:53:55 | Re: [PATCHES] ARC Memory Usage analysis |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2004-10-26 05:17:40 | Re: [PATCHES] ARC Memory Usage analysis |