Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Hannu Krosing" <hannu(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Asko Oja" <ascoja(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Dimitri Fontaine" <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Martin Pihlak" <martin(dot)pihlak(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures
Date: 2008-08-19 11:48:06
Message-ID: 873al1p6o9.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Hannu Krosing" <hannu(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:

> Maybe there should be something in postgreSQL docs that warns users against
> using functions in any non-trivial circumstances, as functions are not
> expected to behave like the rest of postgreSQL features and there is
> not plan to fix that ?

Now who's trolling :)

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Get trained by Bruce Momjian - ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostgreSQL training!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Markus Wanner 2008-08-19 11:52:56 Re: about postgres-r setup.
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2008-08-19 10:46:15 Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures