From: | Andreas Seltenreich <seltenreich(at)gmx(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 |
Date: | 2018-02-18 11:18:43 |
Message-ID: | 87371yczqk.fsf@ansel.ydns.eu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Pavan Deolasee writes:
> Thanks for doing those tests. I've just sent v16a version of the patch and
> I think it fixes the issues reported so far. Can you please recheck? Please
> let me know if there are other issues detected by sqlsmith or otherwise.
I re-did the testing with merge_v16a applied to master at 7923118c16
with ad7dbee368a reverted because of conflicts. I can confirm that the
previous testcases don't fail anymore, but sqlsmith readily triggers the
following assertion:
TRAP: FailedAssertion("!(mergeTargetRelation > 0)", File: "planner.c",
Line: 1496)
Testcase attached.
regards,
Andreas
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
merge-v16a-trap-planner.c.sql | application/x-sql | 1.3 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michail Nikolaev | 2018-02-18 13:43:20 | Re: [HACKERS] Can ICU be used for a database's default sort order? |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2018-02-18 04:58:39 | different results from plpgsql functions related to last changes in master |