Re: IMMUTABLE and PARALLEL SAFE function markings

From: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Gajus Kuizinas <gajus(at)gajus(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: IMMUTABLE and PARALLEL SAFE function markings
Date: 2018-11-27 01:49:30
Message-ID: 8736rnpa4e.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I'm a bit more concerned by the fact that inlining the function isn't
affecting the parallel safety of the query - the fact that parallel
safety is being checked prior to inlining means that if inlining
*introduces* a parallel hazard, it will go unnoticed?

--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Haribabu Kommi 2018-11-27 01:53:05 Re: Accounting of zero-filled buffers in EXPLAIN (BUFFERS)
Previous Message Haribabu Kommi 2018-11-27 01:48:36 Re: Pluggable Storage - Andres's take