Re: Quad Xeon vs. Dual Itanium

From: Doug McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org>
To: John Gibson <gib(at)edgate(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Quad Xeon vs. Dual Itanium
Date: 2004-02-09 16:44:16
Message-ID: 871xp4kxsv.fsf@asmodeus.mcnaught.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

John Gibson <gib(at)edgate(dot)com> writes:

> Assuming similar memory and disk sub-systems, I am considering a Quad
> Xeon system vs. a Dual Itanium for PostgreSQL. I believe that the
> PostgreSQL code is written for 32 bit and not optimized for the 64 bit
> Itanium cpu. That makes me think that the Xeon system would be a
> better choice.

Postgres runs on many 64-bit systems, including UltraSPARC, MIPS, and
Alpha, plus the Intel and AMD offerings. What makes you think it's
'not optimized'?

-Doug

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Howard 2004-02-09 16:49:51 plperlu and 'use' statement scope question
Previous Message John Gibson 2004-02-09 16:43:41 Quad Xeon vs. Dual Itanium