Re: value too long error

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: value too long error
Date: 2004-03-01 17:28:38
Message-ID: 871xoceat5.fsf@stark.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com> writes:

> In OO programming, the generally accepted rule is that a program shouldn't
> access class values directly, but the class should have methods to set
> and retrieve the data. This allows internal representations to change
> without affecting the public API of the class. It also allows data
> validation to occur, if needed.

Note that this is largely a C++ rule. In C++ accessing class members is very
different and much less flexible than using class methods. Other OO languages
are not universally so hobbled.

> I'm just wondering how far this rule of thumb could/should be extended to
> databases? I mean, you could say: "Nobody does a direct INSERT, but always
> calls a stored procedure that stores the result." I don't know how much
> this might break the mindset of the client developer.

This is a popular old-school database approach. Personally I find it
incredibly annoying, but I can see its advantages as well. But to me stored
procedures just don't seem like nearly a powerful enough abstraction tool to
make them worth all the pain this approach entails.

--
greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2004-03-01 17:33:06 Re: md5 calls
Previous Message Stephan Szabo 2004-03-01 17:10:57 Re: ORDER BY problem