Re: Wierd panic with 7.4.7

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Wierd panic with 7.4.7
Date: 2005-06-29 06:51:20
Message-ID: 871x6lzmdz.fsf@stark.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> In the second place, we don't treat communication failures as ERRORs,
> so how did step 3 happen?

You probably realize this, but just in case: "Broken Pipe" probably means the
backend received SIGPIPE, not just that some file operation syscall returned
-1.

--
greg

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paesold 2005-06-29 06:55:27 Re: [HACKERS] Dbsize backend integration
Previous Message strk 2005-06-29 06:29:23 Re: CVS pg_config --includedir-server broken